It would be fair to say that we’re going through a period of realisation that social media may not have been such a good thing after all. The list of serious complaints continues to grow. Social media is making our children depressed and anxious. It’s killing democracy. It’s guilty of fostering the rise of fascism across the world. It’s making us isolated. It’s making us insecure. It puts people in algorithmic filter bubbles where you are fed ragebait to keep you engaged. Strange how something designed to bring people together managed to do the exact opposite.

I won’t discuss again how our dream of social media as a force for good was shattered, that has been a well-trodden path in these pages, and I will not cover again the reasons for this change, but I will point out that not only has our erstwhile illusion with the potential of social media has dissipated, it has turned into a nightmare. We went from utopia to dystopia in a few short years.

There are lots of problems with social media, from the dodgy ownership of sites like Facebook and Twitter (I still refuse to call it X), to the insufferable tone of content on Instagram, to the sickly corporate lingospeak hellscape that is LinkedIn, ending with Bluesky, the smug corner of the Web where the Left went to have fights with each other.

The prevailing narrative as to why social media has turned out to be so toxic for humanity is that social media exists to keep people engaged, and nothing engages more than anger, so the entire business model is to keep people as angry as possible, this sows division across the board, and this eventually leads to most of the negative social consequences.The almighty algorithm directing us towards paths from which we can’t recover.

But it’s easy to blame the algorithm when it is being fed by everyday users. I grew up believing that people were mostly good, and I still think that this holds. But I also learned very early on that the world was filled with nasty people, I’m not talking the villains of the world, but your bullies, liars, cheaters, hypocrites, snitches, and petty tyrants. The bully at school who used to make my bus trips a nightmare. The guy who kept stealing stuff from the office and laughed every time we would point it out to him (but we wouldn’t snitch on him). The guy at the gym lying about pretty much everything, from weight lifted to his inexistent girlfriends. These are the people whose everyday conduct would not have made any splashes before, only to those immediately affected. But social media has given the not-so-worst of humanity a stage in which to commit their petty squabbles. So we have bullies, liars, and cheats at a global stage.

The result is that the global social media still is inhabited by normal people sharing pictures of cats, but the fuel that keeps the algorithmic hate engine going consists of an army of inconsequential pitiful users, the keyboard warriors fighting thousands of minor online battles. It’s death by a thousand petty disputes.

The solution then is to abandon social media, right? Touch grass and all that. But I don’t think it’s that easy as it has become an integral part of our everyday lives. One of the issues is that when we discuss the evils of social media, the first platforms that come to mind are Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok and Instagram. But if we define social media as any interactive digital platforms that facilitate the creation and sharing of user-generated content, then we start seeing that this covers practically all of our social interactions online, and includes messaging apps such as Whatsapp, Discord, Signal, and Telegram, as well as discussion forums such as Reddit. The problem there is that even if these sites do not suffer from the algorithmic element of most other social media, they are still inhabited by us, with all the good and the bad. And there is quite a lot of bad.

With that in mind, these are the top social media apps in the world:


Messaging apps are interesting because they act as information silos in a more comprehensive way than the worst echo chambers in the “traditional” social media sense. This fosters groups of like-minded people who can engage in the most arcane discussions never hearing a dissenting voice. Messaging apps and group chats are therefore a more pervasive breeding ground for all of the nastiness that social media has to offer. You can escape Facebook and Twitter, but are you really willing to let go of Whatsapp?

We can escape into new spaces, but the problem is that we always end up finding ourselves.

This is just a diagnostic blog post written while recovering from viral laryngitis, I don’t have solutions, and I don’t think that “just log off and touch grass” is a viable solution any more. So I go back to previous blog posts about not falling for the negativity, the algorithm wants you angry. But also try to be mindful of the users that are feeding you the anger in the first place. Why are you still paying them attention? That is one thing we can all do, turn them off.

I will go out though, and may even turn off my phone.

Categories: Social media

6 Comments

Anonymous · November 4, 2025 at 7:59 am

10 years ago a blog post had comments by real people. These days, real people only comment on Facebook and the other big information silos. But I’m happy to comment here. It’s a start.

You should stop adding your gold nuggets to Twitter/X. Because it’s an awful place, awash with lies, transforming people into awful people. No need to work on making it a more attractive destination.

On Bluesky, I have a simple sorting mechanism (reverse chronological). My links to external sources are not throttled/partly censored for no good reason.
You should never use (or add to) a service sporting an evil editor. You should never put it on your phone and you should never allow notifications.
The 50% of my family and friends that subscribe to these simple hygienic rules are by far the least lonely, unhappy and stupid.

Blue sky may be “the smug corner of the Web where the Left went to have fights with each other.” but to a curious centrist it’s also – primarily even – a great place to get links to great (gift) articles by Paul Krugman, Anne Applebaum, Derekguy, Cyriak, Knowyourmeme, Hannah Richie, Renee DiResta, TechnoLlama, Gabrielius Landsbergis and on and on. It’s RSS with some gifts and occasional (pleasant) discussions.

We may “escape into new spaces, but the problem is that we always end up finding ourselves.”
I don’t think it’s possible to make a profitable social media site that isn’t awful. I seem to be able to wrangle Bluesky, Reddit and Youtube well at the moment. Youtube is giving me a torrent of horrible Shorts (violence, hate, AI-slop, thirst traps), but I steer clear of those with Enhancer for Youtube ( https://www.mrfdev.com/enhancer-for-youtube )

There may be such a thing as a good social media company according to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8zfgIgZ4c0

Anonymous · November 4, 2025 at 8:01 am

[In resident nice guy on social media voice] get well soon.

Anonymous · November 4, 2025 at 4:56 pm

I fear you’re dreadfully right: after a while – or above a certain number of participants, whichever comes first – any social medium seems to be fated to turn into a cesspool of hate, deception and bullying. No question, we all saw it happen. But what or who is to blame for that?

I suspect that the “algorithm” (in its today’s meaning, that would make the dust of poor al-Khwarizmi turn in his grave) is largely innocent: far from being an immanent evil spirit haunting and possessing all large computer networks, the “algorithm” is just a human-created and human-driven set of rules that mirrors faithfully the best and the worst of our intrinsic nature. “Merde in, merde out”, used to say my old programming teacher: you cannot expect of a program anything better than you feed it with – ex falso sequitur quodlibet.

Perhaps, discouraging as it may be, whe should clench our teeth and begin to question the Enlightenment ideals we grew with and were taught to take for granted: “we are all equal, potentially good, smart, honest, selfless – give everyone a fair start and everyone will be top-class”.
Well, we’ve tried hard for centuries but alas, in the end giving everybody a modicum of literacy and arithmetic doesn’t seem to have affected their acuity, their sociability, their greed or their morality. Literate or not, there’s still an impressive share of the population ready to saw the branch they’re sitting on – or to troll a forum, or to vote for a clown, it doesn’t make much difference.
Someone said that “democracy can only work if no one’s IQ is below the average”. Quite depressing but probably true.

Andrew Ducker · November 4, 2025 at 7:30 pm

Block. Block early. Block mercilessly. Create for yourself a world free of awful people, by removing them from your life. Leave only the people who you actually know and or bring interesting things into your life.

    Anonymous · November 11, 2025 at 8:35 pm

    No. Not at all. Blocking that aggressively is a sign of a platform failure.

November Copyright Reads – Open Research · November 14, 2025 at 12:25 pm

[…] Social media sucks, but what’s the alternative? […]

Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.