The U.S. Congress has voted the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, the latest piece of legislation that attempts to put a leash on objectionable internet behaviour. As far as online regulation goes, this bill looks like the real thing. The Act makes sure that some existing criminal activities apply to ICTs, such as the internet and mobile device gambling. The problem as I understand with American gambling legislation is that it is strictly a state issue, but with the internet, the possibilities for inter-state online gambling increases. In short, this act tries to ban inter-state gambling through wireless devices.

While it has always been argued that it is difficult to regulate the international and inter-jurisdictional nature of the internet, the new Act tries some novel ways of achieving enforcement. If you cannot possibly attack the transactions as such, and if most providers are online, how can you stop the activity? Stop the payments! The Act prohibits “persons engaged in a gambling business from knowingly accepting credit, electronic fund transfers, checks, drafts, or similar financial instruments or the proceeds of any other financial transaction in connection with unlawful Internet gambling“. By placing this prohibition, banks and credit card facility suppliers can block unlawful transactions, and they are awarded civil immunity in cases they block such a transaction.

I wonder how will banks know which transactions to block. My guess is that online gambling sites will start trying to mask their names in some ways. While I’m sceptical of the efficacy of this legislation, I beleive that this is the next generation in Internet regulation. Goverments of the world will indeed take heed of this move.

However, I found some parts of the legislation quite telling. The new Act excludes from the gambling definition activities such as securities exchanges. Gambling with cards is not kosher, but gambling with the stock market is OK.

Categories: Regulation

9 Comments

Eric Bergen · October 4, 2006 at 7:42 am

There is hope! It appears that outlawing online gambling violates the US agreements with the WTO. We better get a Democrat in office soon. You can sign the petition on my site

feneuk · October 4, 2006 at 8:59 am

Well, I just finish writing a short piece in my blog refering to previous WTO case law where US has lost on restictions to online gambling. Whether the same case can be used here needs more analysis because that case was not very straightforward…

feneuk · October 7, 2006 at 4:34 pm

Again on the topic, what I think opens the door to challenge, in addition of the WTO Aitigua ruling, is the fact that expressely excludes horseracing from the ban…

Freudian Slip · October 12, 2006 at 10:53 pm

What a bunch of balony this is. And the fact that this is all just a rider on a bigger piece of legislation. We sure do need some new blood in congress! What about our freedom!<a href="http://www.swimperials.info/mainsitemap.php">Matt

online gambling · November 12, 2007 at 7:32 am

What about our rights and freedom? Wasn't the Constitution supposed to be about that?

Nytro · December 23, 2007 at 7:09 am

Just another crooked politician with his own agenda that is ignoring the rights of the American people to enjoy gambling from the comfort of their own home.

Jerry · December 23, 2007 at 9:35 pm

The U.S. will finally give into the world when it comes down to accepting online gambling to American citizens.

Eyelet Curtains&nbsp · October 20, 2010 at 6:01 am

online gambing sites are growing because there is a growing number of online gamblers today,`;

    Andres · October 20, 2010 at 9:03 am

    The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club 🙂

Leave a Reply to Freudian Slip Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: