<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letters from the ISP front</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=letters-from-the-isp-front</link>
	<description>Yet Another Technology Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Letters from the ISP front « TechnoLlama -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front/comment-page-1#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Letters from the ISP front « TechnoLlama -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 12:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2515#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Evert Bopp, clarinette, clarinette, Andres Guadamuz, Poppy Dog and others. Poppy Dog said: RT @technollama: New blog post: Letters from the ISP front - http://tinyurl.com/y9wdceg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Evert Bopp, clarinette, clarinette, Andres Guadamuz, Poppy Dog and others. Poppy Dog said: RT @technollama: New blog post: Letters from the ISP front &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y9wdceg" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y9wdceg</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front/comment-page-1#comment-2909</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2515#comment-2909</guid>
		<description>Thanks TJ, I was not aware that the matter may be going back to the High Court. Who knows, things might change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks TJ, I was not aware that the matter may be going back to the High Court. Who knows, things might change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front/comment-page-1#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2515#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>You might be interested to know that the Irish Eircom settlement has not yet been implemented. The Data Protection Commissioner has intervened to express concern about the privacy implications of the proposed system, which the parties have not been able to allay. The matter is set to return to the High Court in the not too distant future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested to know that the Irish Eircom settlement has not yet been implemented. The Data Protection Commissioner has intervened to express concern about the privacy implications of the proposed system, which the parties have not been able to allay. The matter is set to return to the High Court in the not too distant future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarinette02</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/letters-from-the-isp-front/comment-page-1#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>clarinette02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2515#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>The E-commerce directive was a big step towards intermediary immunity for third party contents. We are now going a big step backward by making ISPs the judge and the jury of a complex matter: the online copyright protection.
The ACTA secret negotiations represent a serious threat to democracy and privacy. As discussed by the scholar Paul Ohm, ISPs are business model is in danger, they need money and the Deep Packet Inspection that will be legally implied will in my view, give them the perfect excuse to digg dipp users&#039; privacy.
See more on the subject and the position taken by the UK ISP TalkTalk on the cost of the Three Strikes Bill: http://clarinettesblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-should-we-all-pay-for-music.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The E-commerce directive was a big step towards intermediary immunity for third party contents. We are now going a big step backward by making ISPs the judge and the jury of a complex matter: the online copyright protection.<br />
The ACTA secret negotiations represent a serious threat to democracy and privacy. As discussed by the scholar Paul Ohm, ISPs are business model is in danger, they need money and the Deep Packet Inspection that will be legally implied will in my view, give them the perfect excuse to digg dipp users&#8217; privacy.<br />
See more on the subject and the position taken by the UK ISP TalkTalk on the cost of the Three Strikes Bill: <a href="http://clarinettesblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-should-we-all-pay-for-music.html" rel="nofollow">http://clarinettesblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/why-should-we-all-pay-for-music.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
