<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia</link>
	<description>Yet Another Technology Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia &#171; Descent Into Darkness</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/comment-page-1#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia &#171; Descent Into Darkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2543#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>[...] iiNet is an Australian internet provider, which was sued by Australian film producer Roadshow Films, part of the Village Roadshow conglomerate.  However, the real power behind the suit was the weight provided by several Hollywood studios, including Warner, Columbia, 20th Century, and Sony Pictures.  The question at the heart of the proceedings was whether an ISP is to be held liable for the copyright infringement committed by its customers. - TechnoLlama [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iiNet is an Australian internet provider, which was sued by Australian film producer Roadshow Films, part of the Village Roadshow conglomerate.  However, the real power behind the suit was the weight provided by several Hollywood studios, including Warner, Columbia, 20th Century, and Sony Pictures.  The question at the heart of the proceedings was whether an ISP is to be held liable for the copyright infringement committed by its customers. &#8211; TechnoLlama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshal</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/comment-page-1#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2543#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Great analysis. As I said on Twitter, people really don&#039;t know the importance of this news, especially on countrys like CR, where P2P of protected files is something as normal as using any web browser.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis. As I said on Twitter, people really don&#8217;t know the importance of this news, especially on countrys like CR, where P2P of protected files is something as normal as using any web browser.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 5/2/2010: Linux Foundation Contest for 2010 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/comment-page-1#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 5/2/2010: Linux Foundation Contest for 2010 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2543#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>[...] Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia  This is a lengthy and complex ruling, but it is remarkable that it has fallen upon a judge that seems to get the importance of the ruling in the wider context, and also who got the technical complexities involved. Cowdroy J has managed to wade through the technical issues with exceptional clarity, and has produced a ruling that should become an instant classic. The judge accurately identifies that the case hinges on two simple questions. Have the iiNet customers infringed copyright directly? The answer is yes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia  This is a lengthy and complex ruling, but it is remarkable that it has fallen upon a judge that seems to get the importance of the ruling in the wider context, and also who got the technical complexities involved. Cowdroy J has managed to wade through the technical issues with exceptional clarity, and has produced a ruling that should become an instant classic. The judge accurately identifies that the case hinges on two simple questions. Have the iiNet customers infringed copyright directly? The answer is yes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme West</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/comment-page-1#comment-3094</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2543#comment-3094</guid>
		<description>What a day for copyright in Australia, eh? Men at Work and Peer to Peer!

Thanks for the analysis - I found it very useful. I&#039;ll post a link to it on the LCIT class forum if one is not already there.

Graeme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a day for copyright in Australia, eh? Men at Work and Peer to Peer!</p>
<p>Thanks for the analysis &#8211; I found it very useful. I&#8217;ll post a link to it on the LCIT class forum if one is not already there.</p>
<p>Graeme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/landmark-isp-liability-case-decided-in-australia/comment-page-1#comment-3092</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2543#comment-3092</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by technollama: New blog post: Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia - http://tinyurl.com/yfnaref...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by technollama: New blog post: Landmark ISP liability case decided in Australia &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yfnaref.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yfnaref..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
