http://www.technollama.co.uk/isp-liability-to-get-ecj-hearing?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=isp-liability-to-get-ecj-hearing Yet Another Technology Law Blog Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:35:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.technollama.co.uk/isp-liability-to-get-ecj-hearing/comment-page-1#comment-3164 Andres Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:37:36 +0000 http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2553#comment-3164 It really is quite a sentence! Because of the various directives it invokes, there is a big chance that it will define the topic of ISP liability. The most important aspect about the question though is that we may finally get a definitive answer about the balance between the ISP indemnity contained in the e-commerce directive and copyright enforcement. It really is quite a sentence! Because of the various directives it invokes, there is a big chance that it will define the topic of ISP liability. The most important aspect about the question though is that we may finally get a definitive answer about the balance between the ISP indemnity contained in the e-commerce directive and copyright enforcement.

]]> http://www.technollama.co.uk/isp-liability-to-get-ecj-hearing/comment-page-1#comment-3162 AJ Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:00:42 +0000 http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2553#comment-3162 Wow question 1 is one hell of sentence, 209 words and refers to no less than 5 separate EU directives and the ECHR. Presumably we can expect similar questions referred to the ECJ and joined cases, long before we get a reponse on this. Wow question 1 is one hell of sentence, 209 words and refers to no less than 5 separate EU directives and the ECHR. Presumably we can expect similar questions referred to the ECJ and joined cases, long before we get a reponse on this.

]]>