Comments on: Flickr, stock photography and Creative Commons

By: Creative Commons dilemma eller vem ska man tro på? | Kristina Alexandersons blogg

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 20:34:44 +0000

[...] minns jag TechnoLlamas inlägg Flickr, stock photography and Creative Commons där han skriver om just att ändra ett verk från Creative Commons till Copyright och hans [...]

By: Andres

Andres — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:40:41 +0000

Hi,

The work is always under copyright, I think that what you mean is either full rights or some rights reserved.

And the answer is yes, if it’s under a BY-SA licence for example, they could be printing and selling the pdf even after I decide to “close” the work. This is why I think that NC licences are often useful.

By: Kunal

Kunal — Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:30:28 +0000

Thanks for this informative article. I think this line in your blog is incorrect – “While I have closed the blog for future users, those who re-used the content already can continue to do so, not only that, the teacher can continue distributing the pdf of “TechnoLlama’s Greatest Hits” online, as long as it is done non-commercially and it is shared using the same licence. ”

What if your work was under a CC – can use for commercial use license, then even if you changed it back to copyrighted, the person can still re-distribute the technollama’s greatest hits and earn money from it right ?

By: Lanzamiento del Grupo Internacional de Flickr de Sorry Zorrito

Lanzamiento del Grupo Internacional de Flickr de Sorry Zorrito — Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:32:34 +0000

[...] Andrés Guadamuz (radicado en el Reino Unido) explica toda la situación y sus implicaciones en su blog. También menciona otros detalles cuestionables del nuevo servicio (como que Getty se queda con 80% [...]