<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do perverts have rights?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/do-perverts-have-rights/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/do-perverts-have-rights</link>
	<description>Not Just Another Technology Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austrotrabant</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/do-perverts-have-rights/comment-page-1#comment-3655</link>
		<dc:creator>Austrotrabant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2663#comment-3655</guid>
		<description>Dearest Andres, 

(note language indicates that need something from you) 

I really like your blog (see ablove) and think you posts are outstanding (getting difficult to bear from here). 

One of the things that has impressed me most in our LLM was how direct you communicated certain issues and I really DID liked the &quot;The Internet is for Porn&quot; aspect you mentioned in your course as I am convinced that this is an aspect that had some influence onto the internet and the way people used and use the internet. (just check out the first 30 most popular sites worldwide on Alexa.com) 

In my dissertation I also have a chapter about the differences how men and women use the internet (or to be more precise: search engines) as I need that stuff for the issue of a likeliness of confusion (Yes, still working on Keyword Advertising). 

Thus coming to the point: Any suggestion how I can make my point without using &quot;inappropriate language&quot;-&gt; uncitable language??? I&#039;ve found Spin/Jansen/Wolfram/Saracevic&#039;s paper &quot;From E-Sex to E-Commerce: Web Search Changes&quot; but somehow it just doesn&#039;t strike the issue as precisely as the Youtube-Video. 

Kind regards, 

-max-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dearest Andres, </p>
<p>(note language indicates that need something from you) </p>
<p>I really like your blog (see ablove) and think you posts are outstanding (getting difficult to bear from here). </p>
<p>One of the things that has impressed me most in our LLM was how direct you communicated certain issues and I really DID liked the &#8220;The Internet is for Porn&#8221; aspect you mentioned in your course as I am convinced that this is an aspect that had some influence onto the internet and the way people used and use the internet. (just check out the first 30 most popular sites worldwide on Alexa.com) </p>
<p>In my dissertation I also have a chapter about the differences how men and women use the internet (or to be more precise: search engines) as I need that stuff for the issue of a likeliness of confusion (Yes, still working on Keyword Advertising). </p>
<p>Thus coming to the point: Any suggestion how I can make my point without using &#8220;inappropriate language&#8221;-&gt; uncitable language??? I&#8217;ve found Spin/Jansen/Wolfram/Saracevic&#8217;s paper &#8220;From E-Sex to E-Commerce: Web Search Changes&#8221; but somehow it just doesn&#8217;t strike the issue as precisely as the Youtube-Video. </p>
<p>Kind regards, </p>
<p>-max-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

