<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright in landmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-landmarks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-landmarks</link>
	<description>Not Just Another Technology Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-landmarks/comment-page-1#comment-3584</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2674#comment-3584</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you mean UK law? :P

But yes, UK law is different in this respect (and much more logical IMO). It seems like Brazilian law has no equivalent provision, and neither does U.S copyright law. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you mean UK law? <img src='http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But yes, UK law is different in this respect (and much more logical IMO). It seems like Brazilian law has no equivalent provision, and neither does U.S copyright law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-landmarks/comment-page-1#comment-3583</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2674#comment-3583</guid>
		<description>Hi Andres

This isn&#039;t a problem under English law - see section 62 CDPA 1988:

62 Representation of certain artistic works on public display

(1) This section applies to—

(a) buildings, and

(b) sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.

(2) The copyright in such a work is not infringed by—

(a) making a graphic work representing it,

(b) making a photograph or film of it, or

(c) broadcasting or including in a cable programme service a visual image of it.

(3) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of copies, or the broadcasting or inclusion in a cable programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of this section, not an infringement of the copyright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andres</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a problem under English law &#8211; see section 62 CDPA 1988:</p>
<p>62 Representation of certain artistic works on public display</p>
<p>(1) This section applies to—</p>
<p>(a) buildings, and</p>
<p>(b) sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.</p>
<p>(2) The copyright in such a work is not infringed by—</p>
<p>(a) making a graphic work representing it,</p>
<p>(b) making a photograph or film of it, or</p>
<p>(c) broadcasting or including in a cable programme service a visual image of it.</p>
<p>(3) Nor is the copyright infringed by the issue to the public of copies, or the broadcasting or inclusion in a cable programme service, of anything whose making was, by virtue of this section, not an infringement of the copyright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.technollama.co.uk/copyright-in-landmarks/comment-page-1#comment-3582</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technollama.co.uk/?p=2674#comment-3582</guid>
		<description>2012 is a truly truly awful picture. I hope Sony are sued into a smoking pile of celluloid for having made it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2012 is a truly truly awful picture. I hope Sony are sued into a smoking pile of celluloid for having made it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

